(CNN)Unless you have been living on another planet for the last few weeks, you know that Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R) went to Cancun — for a day — while his state was in the grips of extreme cold weather and massive failure of its power grid.

Cruz’s terrible judgment — and weak attempt to explain that poor judgment — drew national (and international) headlines. But, did it also obscure the stumbles and poor decision-making by Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott? As in, did Cruz’s bad publicity make us miss the real story of the grid failure — Abbott’s own failures amid crisis?After all, Abbott, as governor, has far more actual influence in the way the state makes (and made) decisions about its power supply — and oversight over the groups that are responsible for ensuring that a catastrophe like the one that happened earlier this month in Texas don’t happen. Abbott, for instance, appointed longtime aide DeAnn Walker to head the state’s Public Utility Commission, one of the entities with oversight of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), which runs the Texas power grid and has come in for the lion’s share of blame for the outages.


In each episode of his weekly YouTube show, Chris Cillizza will delve a little deeper into the surreal world of politics. Click to subscribe!

And it was Abbott who tried to initially blame liberal energy policies for the crisis — after ERCOT reported that some wind turbines has frozen in the cold weather. “This shows how the Green New Deal would be a deadly deal for the United States of America,” Abbott told Fox News’ Sean Hannity, neglecting the fact that the primary reason for the electricity shortage was due to issues with the state’s natural gas supply.Read MoreAnd it was Abbott who aside from that Hannity interview, was largely absent from the airwaves amid the teeth of the crisis. As the Washington Post noted on February 21:”It was clear by Tuesday afternoon that Texas was in a full-blown crisis — and Gov. Greg Abbott (R) had largely been out of sight.”More than 4 million households did not have power amid dangerously low temperatures, and an increasing number did not have heat or running water. Some families were burning furniture to stay warm, grocery stores were emptying, and people were dying. In the freezing darkness, many desperate Texans felt they were left to fend for themselves.And it is Abbott who, according to an analysis by the National Institute on Money in Politics, has collected more than $26 million in campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry. And who has received thousands of dollars in contributions from three members of ERCOT’s board. (Five members of the board resigned earlier this week.)And it is Abbott — along with the rest of the Republican elected officials in the state — who ignored recommendations to winterize their energy operation following a 2011 winter storm that seized up a decent chunk of the state’s power grid. As the Texas Tribune wrote recently:”In 2011, Texas faced a very similar storm that froze natural gas wells and affected coal plants and wind turbines, leading to power outages across the state. A decade later, Texas power generators have still not made all the investments necessary to prevent plants from tripping offline during extreme cold, experts said.”To be clear: The blame here is not Abbott’s alone. There’s plenty blame to go around when something this catastrophic happens. But by any objective measure, Abbott’s actions (and lack of action) should leave him with far more blame than, say, Cruz who, as a sitting Senator has virtually no formal role to play in the crisis. (As I noted last week, Cruz still should have understood that his job is to comfort struggling constituents, whether or not he can do anything specific about the problem.)How much of a hit — if any — has Abbott taken for his less-than-stellar performance amid the crisis? It’s not clear because there hasn’t been any quality polling done since the power problems hit. But according to a Texas Tribune/University of Texas poll released in October, Abbott’s approval numbers were on the decline. A total of 47% of Texans approved of the job he was doing as compared to 40% who disapproved. That’s not terrible but it’s a far cry from the 56 percent favorable/32% unfavorable rating that Abbott had in the same poll back in April 2020. Much of Abbott’s declining numbers was explained at the time as the less than stellar ratings he was getting on the coronavirus crisis; 44% approved of how he was handling the virus while 46% disapproved in the October Tribune poll.Even if Abbott’s numbers take a further hit in the wake of the electricity crisis (and it seems likely they will), he still has to be considered a favorite to win a third term next November given Texas’ (still) Republican tilt.That said, former Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D) has been making noise about a potential run for governor and, if he does run, could make Abbott’s life much more difficult between now and November 2022.

Source Link: