Fort Lauderdale, Florida (CNN)Yujing Zhang, the Chinese woman arrested at Mar-a-Lago, President Donald Trump’s private Florida club, earlier this year, has been found guilty on counts of unlawfully entering a restricted building and making false statements to a federal officer.
Prosecutors called nine witnesses in a trial that lasted two days. Zhang chose to represent herself during the trial with assistance from the Federal Public Defender’s office and court-appointed translators.Zhang was soft-spoken Wednesday, as she has been all week, before being escorted away by marshals. She will remain in custody until her sentencing in late November. She faces up to six years in prison. Jurors did not begin deliberations with their minds made up, and were not fazed by the attention on the trial, juror Nibaldo Padilla told CNN in an interview after the verdict was read shortly after 2 p.m. ET.”We debated every single thing – that’s why it took so long. We thoroughly looked into this case before we voted on it,” the juror said. “She got a fair trial. We didn’t reach this verdict lightly.” Read MoreA point of discussion in the jury room was whether Zhang was actually given permission to be on the property since she technically passed the first checkpoint and was escorted to Mar-a-Lago. “Check point 1″ is what prosecutors and the Secret Service used to describe the parking lot at the Bath and Tennis club — it’s not technically Mar-a-Lago property, but as discussed during trial, when the President or members of the President’s family are present, a security perimeter is set up and Mar-a-Lago uses that parking lot for the initial check point — Zhang passed that check point and then was escorted onto the Mar-a-Lago property by golf cart, as seen in video shown in court. (Trump was not physically on the property when the incident occurred.)Jurors, however, believed that Zhang knew she wasn’t supposed to be there, Padilla said.”She knew that she had to be authorized to be there. She was given a lot of chances – she knew the event she was going to go to was cancelled – even the taxi driver told her the night before that you have to be authorized, have an invitation or be a member of the club,” Padilla said. “She didn’t have any of that and she still went.”Padilla said the language barrier was not an issue. “Clearly she knew English and she was reading documents and using English,” he said. “It wasn’t part of the discussion. Zhang didn’t present a case, Padilla said, and “ultimately that’s what hurt her — it hindered our ability to know her side.””We would have liked to have her story,” Padilla said. “Her story in this case could have influenced the jury, it could have or at the very least explained her side of things … it’s unfortunate.”He added: “a lot of the process is whether she was willfully or knowingly there. We didn’t really know her intent. The whole premise was this event but the evidence showed it was canceled days before (she flew to the US) and she still used it to gain access to be there.”The trialThe case frustrated the US district judge overseeing it, fascinated those following the trial and seemed to have confused the defendant who has chosen to defend herself despite all efforts by the court and the Federal Public Defenders office. “I don’t even know why I’m here today. I thought my case was canceled…” were among the first remarks Zhang told the court prior to jury selection Monday. Over the past two days, US prosecutors laid out their case as to why Zhang should be found guilty of unlawfully entering a restricted building and making false statements to a federal officer. “She lied to everyone to get onto that property,” US Attorney Ronaldo Garcia told jurors during his closing statement Tuesday. Dovetailing off football analogies Judge Roy Altman and US Attorney Michael Sherwin used a day earlier, Garcia told jurors, “the United States scored a touchdown.”Prosecutors presented evidence that they believed would prove beyond a reasonable doubt to the jury that “anyone with common sense” would have known they were going to enter restricted property: photographs of signage that outline security details and checkpoints, witnesses — including Mar-a-Lago staff and US Secret Service agents — who testified Zhang lied to them when asked why she was there, and FBI experts who extracted data from her phone to discover messages from an individual from Zhang’s native China warning her not to go to Trump’s club, as the event she was hoping to attend — as part of a $20,000 vacation package — was canceled. Once confronted by Mar-a-Lago staff and later questioned by Secret Service agents, Zhang was discovered with Chinese passports and a flash drive containing malware and had a signal detector, other electronic devices and thousands of dollars in cash in her hotel room.Zhang, who remained mostly tight-lipped throughout the trial, seemed as though she wasn’t listening intently to witness testimony, but shuffled through papers in front of her. At times she appeared as though she was looking at the pages, but not necessarily reading the words on them. Altman repeated questions to her when she appeared to not understand court proceedings, her answers were provided at times in broken English and at times through court-appointed Mandarin translators.Defendant is: Yujing Zhang Artist is: Daniel Pontet Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida”I did not lying, I followed the instruction. I went into the Mar-a-Lago to have a visit. So that’s what I want to say, and thank you for your attention,” she told jurors during her brief closing statement. Zhang, who did not present her own case, on Tuesday attempted to object to a few prosecution exhibits from being — like her phone and receipts found in her purse when she was arrested — into evidence because they were “personal,” “sensitive,” or “irrelevant” to the case against her, but the judge overruled her each time.Jurors, during long pauses between Altman’s questions and Zhang’s answers switched from looking at each other quizzically and staring at intently at Zhang, waiting for any type of answer or response from the defendant.The Secret Service said it would not issue a statement following the verdict.This story has been updated.